Software Licensing Featured Articles

Beware of Implied Licensing Implications

February 21, 2014
By Mae Kowalke, Software Licensing Contributor

When crafting software licenses, companies need to recognize that they can’t easily contract away common sense.

Of course, software firms can write just about whatever they want into their software licensing terms, but they need to be aware of “implied” licensing. Just because something is written into the software license, that doesn’t necessarily mean the courts will respect the agreement.

A case in point is a dispute in the European Union between UsedSoft and Oracle. Oracle had included a relatively standard software licensing clause into its user agreement that granted a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the software for an unlimited period of time to the purchaser. Pretty standard stuff.

However, UsedSoft began selling “used” Oracle software licenses, which on the face of it would seem to be a clear violation of the software license’s non-transferable rights clause.

The courts found otherwise, though, and sided with UsedSoft. That’s because the European Court of Justice ruled that this “transfer” amounted to a “sale” under Article 4(2) of Directive 91/250/EEC, meaning the right of ownership in that copy of the software was exchanged. Because this was a sale, Oracle could not prevent the thing that was sold from being re-sold even though it was written into the Oracle license agreement.

There are other scenarios where implied licensing can come into effect.

In VLM Holdings v Ravensworth Digital Services, a parent company granted a software license to its subsidiary, which then granted a sub-license to the end user. When the subsidiary later went into liquidation, its license from the parent company was terminated. The High Court ruled that the end user’s sub-license survived the termination of the head-license, however, causing the parent company to be in breach of a separate license of the same software that it had granted to a third party on an exclusive basis. That’s because the dealings higher in the chain should not affect the contract entered into under good faith by an end user.

This all is common sense when you think about it, but we can lose sight of common sense sometimes when we try to craft license agreements that meet our current needs as software developers. Just because we write a software license does not mean that it will perform exactly as we intend.

What does this mean for companies? It means that software licenses need to be developed more thoughtfully, with an eye toward common sense.

Things in particular to watch out for:

  • Prohibitions on sub-licensing or assignment when the licensor or licensee is part of a group of companies.
  • Careful understanding of who is the underlying copyright owner for each piece of software sold.
  • In places where agreements are varied, strict adherence to contractual procedures to stay in compliance.
  • The licensee should ensure that the licensor warrants that it has authority to grant the license, and also that it provides protection against any third party claims that could impact the licensee’s use of the software.
  • The granting of licenses that don’t amount to a sale, since the “selling” of something introduces a host of implied license features itself.

While cases such as that between UsedSoft and Oracle can be frightening for developers, and implied licenses make situations more complex, a little thoughtfulness can go a long way toward staying on the right side of compliance.

Edited by Blaise McNamee

Featured Press Release

Featured White Papers

The Third Industrial Revolution: Intelligent Devices, Software, and the Internet of Things

The Third Industrial Revolution: Intelligent Devices, Software, and the Internet of Things
Based on this report, it is clear that device manufacturers are emerging from a period of significant challenge – characterized by low margins, stiff competition and brittle manufacturing supply chains. Increasingly they are retooling their offerings to make them intelligent and Internet-connected, opening up new ways of creating value for their customers...

Virtualization, License Compliance and the Application Producer/Enterprise Relationship

Virtualization, License Compliance and the Application Producer/Enterprise Relationship
The relationship between software vendors and intelligent device manufacturers ("application producers") and their customers ("enterprises") has been a complicated one. On the one hand, application producers develop mission-critical applications critical to every facet of an enterprise's operations. Without software, the remarkable efficiency and cost reductions organizations have been able to achieve in recent decades simply wouldn’t be possible.

This white paper examines the pricing and licensing strategies that application producers have put into place and are planning, and the impact that this will have on the often--fraught application producer/enterprise relationship. Download Infographic

The New World of Global Electronic Software Distribution: Sophisticated, Scalable … and Business Smart

Emerging Technology Analysis: Software Licensing and Entitlement Management Is the Key to Monetizing the Internet of Things
Per this new Gartner research report, "The 'Internet of Things' turns all hardware and appliance OEM vendors into software providers. Licensing and entitlement management technology serves as the key mechanism that enables these manufacturers to protect and monetize the embedded intellectual property running as software on these connected devices or the external software applications associated with them..." Download Infographic

Free Trials

See For Yourself Why So Many Trust Flexera Software Solutions

  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
  • News
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook